Question

"scoob" (scoobsti) 09/09/2014 at 22:58 • Filed to: None

2

20

I just learned the 2015 WRX does 0-60 in 4.8 seconds, whereas the STI does it in 5.3. I should change my name to ScoobWRX. Anyways, is there a website in which there is a list of 0-60 times for a bunch of cars?

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > scoob 09/09/2014 at 23:00

3

Yup. But it has a secret code name:

http://www.zeroto60times.com

scoob > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 09/09/2014 at 23:03

1

Perfect! Thanks!

Edit: W0w, that site is the FIRST Google result for "0-60 times" haha.

Party-vi > scoob 09/09/2014 at 23:05

1

You got dat backwards me thinks, as Motortrend lists the '15 STi at 4.6 seconds to 60mph

Your boy, BJR > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 09/09/2014 at 23:05

1

7.5 in the pilot, mofo!

SmoresTM Has No Chill (O==[][]==O) > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 09/09/2014 at 23:05

1

BMW 2002: 0-60 in 11.5 seconds

Like a Boss.

claramag, Mustaco Master > scoob 09/09/2014 at 23:08

1

IIRC the WRX had a better 0-60 because it could hit it while still in 2nd, but the STI had to shift to 3rd. Shortly after 60 (65? 70?) the STI would gain the lead back

IIRC

IDROVEAPICKUPTRUCK > scoob 09/09/2014 at 23:11

1

This has been the case with the WRX/STI several times, normally due to gearing with the WRX having a 5 speed and being able to get to 60 in 2nd gear while the STI's 6 speed required a shift to third. I didn't realize it was still the case with the 2015s since they both have 6 speeds now. I don't know where you're getting that 4.8 sec time from though. I think you have the times reversed actually.
http://www.planetsubaru.com/subaru-wrx-vs-…
Motor trend tested the WRX at 5.5 seconds to 60 which I'll believe over any manufacturer claimed time. http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/seda…

Motor trend tests STI at 4.6 seconds. They compare the two quite a bit here:
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/seda…

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Your boy, BJR 09/09/2014 at 23:11

0

That's not bad, actually.

Your boy, BJR > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 09/09/2014 at 23:13

0

Right? Soccer mom's got some balls!

scoob > IDROVEAPICKUPTRUCK 09/09/2014 at 23:17

0

Ah, that makes sense. Idk, I read it from Car and Driver .

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Your boy, BJR 09/09/2014 at 23:18

0

I mean, there are faster soccer-mom mobiles. But not faster soccer-mom mobiles that cost $1.

scoob > Party-vi 09/09/2014 at 23:18

0

Yup, someone else said the same thing. I guess Car and Driver isn't reliable?

Your boy, BJR > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 09/09/2014 at 23:20

1

Also not too many soccer mom mobiles that have honda level parts swappability.

IDROVEAPICKUPTRUCK > scoob 09/09/2014 at 23:21

0

Car and Driver didn't actually do any 0-60 runs it looks like. They have "EST" next to their numbers.

gmporschenut also a fan of hondas > scoob 09/09/2014 at 23:54

0

Clutch drops?

Rolling starts are wrx 7.0, sti 7.1

1/4 mile: wrx13.7 sti 13.3

Kanaric > scoob 09/10/2014 at 00:43

0

It was like this last gen too, except the 09-14 wrx was even faster 0-60.

Remember, more to STI than 1/4 miles. The WRX handling doesn't hold a candle with its open differentials.

promoted by the color red > scoob 09/10/2014 at 01:08

0

It's also better than sub-par sex, the dub-RX.

BiTurbo228 - Dr Frankenstein of Spitfires > SmoresTM Has No Chill (O==[][]==O) 09/10/2014 at 07:17

0

Standard 2002, Ti or Tii?

SmoresTM Has No Chill (O==[][]==O) > BiTurbo228 - Dr Frankenstein of Spitfires 09/10/2014 at 08:12

1

Standard 2002. Mine might be a hair faster though. I have an upgraded carb. Hopefully I'll have dual Webber 40s soon!

Party-vi > scoob 09/10/2014 at 17:01

1

Probably an error in editing. Subaru would not allow a current-gen WRX to be faster than a current-gen STi.